← All surveys

Tasmanian Hospital and Emergency Health System Survey — Results

Privacy-protected results: Only combined answers to choice questions are shown. Written responses are never displayed publicly, and categories containing fewer than 5 answers are suppressed.

Total anonymous responses: 5

1. ABOUT THE EVENT — Are you answering about:

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
My own experienceFewer than 5Suppressed
A family member’s experienceFewer than 5Suppressed
Someone I supported or cared forFewer than 5Suppressed
Someone who has since died00.0%
Another situation I directly witnessed00.0%

2. Approximately when did the event happen?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Within the past month00.0%
1–3 months agoFewer than 5Suppressed
4–6 months agoFewer than 5Suppressed
7–12 months agoFewer than 5Suppressed
1–2 years ago00.0%
2–5 years ago00.0%
More than 5 years ago00.0%
Prefer not to say00.0%

3. In which part of Tasmania did the event begin?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
North-West Coast5100.0%
West Coast00.0%
Northern Tasmania00.0%
North-East Tasmania00.0%
Central Tasmania00.0%
Greater Hobart00.0%
South-East Tasmania00.0%
East Coast00.0%
King Island00.0%
Flinders Island00.0%
Another Tasmanian area00.0%
Prefer not to say00.0%

4. How would you describe the location where the event began?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Major cityFewer than 5Suppressed
Regional townFewer than 5Suppressed
Small rural town00.0%
Remote community00.0%
Farm or isolated property00.0%
On a road or while travelling00.0%
A hospital or health facility00.0%
Unsure00.0%

5. What was the patient’s age group at the time?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Under 500.0%
5–17Fewer than 5Suppressed
18–2900.0%
30–44Fewer than 5Suppressed
45–59Fewer than 5Suppressed
60–69Fewer than 5Suppressed
70–7900.0%
80–8900.0%
90 or older00.0%
Prefer not to say00.0%

6. What was the main medical event?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Suspected heart attack or other cardiac eventFewer than 5Suppressed
Suspected stroke or transient ischaemic attack00.0%
Severe breathing problem00.0%
Severe infection or suspected sepsis00.0%
Serious injury or trauma00.0%
Acute abdominal or surgical conditionFewer than 5Suppressed
Mental health crisis00.0%
Maternity or pregnancy emergency00.0%
Child or infant emergency00.0%
Medication reaction or poisoning00.0%
Sudden loss of consciousness or seizure00.0%
Another urgent medical conditionFewer than 5Suppressed
Diagnosis was not knownFewer than 5Suppressed
Prefer not to say00.0%

7. How suddenly did the condition develop?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Suddenly, within minutes00.0%
Over less than one hourFewer than 5Suppressed
Over several hoursFewer than 5Suppressed
Over one or more daysFewer than 5Suppressed
The condition followed an accident or injury00.0%
UnsureFewer than 5Suppressed

8. GETTING HELP — What was the first action taken?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Called 000 for an ambulanceFewer than 5Suppressed
Called a GP or medical centre00.0%
Called Healthdirect or another telephone health service00.0%
Went directly to a hospitalFewer than 5Suppressed
Went to an urgent care or community health service00.0%
A health professional arranged the transfer00.0%
No help was sought immediately00.0%
Other00.0%

9. Approximately how long after symptoms began was medical help first requested?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Immediately00.0%
Within 10 minutesFewer than 5Suppressed
11–30 minutes00.0%
31–60 minutes00.0%
1–2 hoursFewer than 5Suppressed
2–4 hours00.0%
More than 4 hoursFewer than 5Suppressed
Symptoms had been present for one or more daysFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

10. AMBULANCE — How long did it take for an ambulance to arrive after it was requested?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
10 minutes or less00.0%
11–20 minutesFewer than 5Suppressed
21–30 minutesFewer than 5Suppressed
31–60 minutes00.0%
More than 1 hour but less than 2 hours00.0%
2–4 hours00.0%
More than 4 hours00.0%
An ambulance did not attend00.0%
Not applicableFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

11. Did ambulance officers begin assessment or treatment at the scene?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
YesFewer than 5Suppressed
No00.0%
Only a limited assessment or treatment was possible00.0%
The patient was treated by another health professional first00.0%
Not applicableFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

12. After the ambulance arrived, approximately how long was it before the patient left for a treatment facility?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
10 minutes or less00.0%
11–20 minutesFewer than 5Suppressed
21–30 minutesFewer than 5Suppressed
31–60 minutes00.0%
More than 1 hour00.0%
The patient was treated at the scene and not transported00.0%
Not applicableFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

13. Approximately how long did the ambulance journey to the first treatment point take?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
15 minutes or lessFewer than 5Suppressed
16–30 minutes00.0%
31–60 minutes00.0%
1–2 hours00.0%
2–4 hours00.0%
More than 4 hours00.0%
Not applicableFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

14. After reaching the hospital, how long did the patient remain with ambulance officers before hospital staff formally took over their care?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
No noticeable delayFewer than 5Suppressed
15 minutes or less00.0%
16–30 minutesFewer than 5Suppressed
31–60 minutes00.0%
1–2 hours00.0%
2–4 hours00.0%
More than 4 hours00.0%
Not applicableFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

15. FIRST TREATMENT POINT — What was the first treatment point?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
North West Regional HospitalFewer than 5Suppressed
Mersey Community Hospital00.0%
Launceston General Hospital00.0%
Royal Hobart Hospital00.0%
A district hospital or multipurpose health centre00.0%
A community health or urgent care service00.0%
A GP or medical centreFewer than 5Suppressed
A private hospital00.0%
Treatment began in the ambulance00.0%
Another facility00.0%
Unsure00.0%

16. Was this the closest appropriate health facility?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Yes5100.0%
No—the closest facility could not provide the required service00.0%
No—the ambulance was directed elsewhere00.0%
No for another reason00.0%
Unsure00.0%

17. After arriving, approximately how long was it before the patient was first assessed by a nurse, doctor or appropriate clinician?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
ImmediatelyFewer than 5Suppressed
Within 10 minutes00.0%
11–30 minutesFewer than 5Suppressed
31–60 minutes00.0%
1–2 hoursFewer than 5Suppressed
2–4 hours00.0%
4–8 hours00.0%
More than 8 hours00.0%
Unsure00.0%

18. Approximately how long after arrival did meaningful treatment begin?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
ImmediatelyFewer than 5Suppressed
Within 30 minutes00.0%
31–60 minutesFewer than 5Suppressed
1–2 hoursFewer than 5Suppressed
2–4 hours00.0%
4–8 hours00.0%
8–12 hours00.0%
12–24 hours00.0%
More than 24 hours00.0%
No meaningful treatment was provided thereFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

19. Could the first treatment point provide the care that was needed?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Yes—the condition was treated there00.0%
Partly—the patient was assessed and stabilisedFewer than 5Suppressed
No—the patient required transferFewer than 5Suppressed
No—the required treatment was unavailable00.0%
The patient was discharged without the problem being resolvedFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

20. Which services appeared to be unavailable or delayed at the first treatment point?

Answered: 5 — more than one answer could be selected

AnswerResponsesPercentage
No service was missing or delayedFewer than 5Suppressed
Emergency doctor00.0%
Specialist doctor00.0%
Cardiology serviceFewer than 5Suppressed
Cardiac catheterisation or angiographyFewer than 5Suppressed
Stroke specialist or stroke unit00.0%
CT or other diagnostic imagingFewer than 5Suppressed
Pathology or blood-test results00.0%
Operating theatre00.0%
Intensive care bed00.0%
General hospital bedFewer than 5Suppressed
Mental health service00.0%
Maternity or paediatric service00.0%
Ambulance or patient transport00.0%
OtherFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

21. CARDIAC — If this was a suspected cardiac event, how long did it take to receive an ECG or initial cardiac assessment?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Within 10 minutesFewer than 5Suppressed
11–30 minutes00.0%
31–60 minutes00.0%
1–2 hours00.0%
More than 2 hours00.0%
It was not provided at the first treatment point00.0%
Not applicable—it was not a cardiac eventFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

22. STROKE — If this was a suspected stroke, how long did it take to receive brain imaging such as a CT scan?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Within 30 minutes00.0%
31–60 minutes00.0%
1–2 hours00.0%
2–4 hours00.0%
More than 4 hours00.0%
Imaging was not provided at the first treatment point00.0%
Not applicable—it was not a stroke event5100.0%
Unsure00.0%

23. Was the patient told that a time-sensitive treatment was available or required?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Yes, and it was provided within the required time00.0%
Yes, but it was delayedFewer than 5Suppressed
Yes, but it could not be providedFewer than 5Suppressed
No time-sensitive treatment was required00.0%
No explanation was givenFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

24. TRANSFER — Was the patient transferred to another hospital or facility?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
YesFewer than 5Suppressed
NoFewer than 5Suppressed
A transfer was planned but did not happen00.0%
The patient arranged their own travel to another facility00.0%
Unsure00.0%

25. Why was the transfer required?

Answered: 5 — more than one answer could be selected

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Specialist treatment was unavailableFewer than 5Suppressed
Diagnostic equipment or imaging was unavailableFewer than 5Suppressed
Cardiac treatment was unavailableFewer than 5Suppressed
Stroke treatment was unavailable00.0%
Surgery was unavailable00.0%
No intensive care bed was available00.0%
No suitable hospital bed was available00.0%
Mental health treatment was unavailable00.0%
The patient needed a higher level of care00.0%
The original facility was closing or had limited operating hours00.0%
Another reason00.0%
Not applicableFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

26. Where was the patient transferred?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
North West Regional Hospital00.0%
Mersey Community Hospital00.0%
Launceston General HospitalFewer than 5Suppressed
Royal Hobart Hospital00.0%
Another Tasmanian public hospital00.0%
A Tasmanian private hospital00.0%
A hospital outside Tasmania00.0%
Another health facility00.0%
Not applicableFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

27. How was the patient transferred?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Road ambulanceFewer than 5Suppressed
Emergency helicopter00.0%
Fixed-wing air ambulance00.0%
Private vehicle00.0%
Community or non-emergency patient transport00.0%
Another method00.0%
Transfer did not occur00.0%
Not applicableFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

28. How long was it from the decision to transfer until the patient departed?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
30 minutes or less00.0%
31–60 minutesFewer than 5Suppressed
1–2 hours00.0%
2–4 hours00.0%
4–8 hours00.0%
8–12 hours00.0%
12–24 hours00.0%
More than 24 hours00.0%
The transfer did not occur00.0%
Not applicableFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

29. After arriving at the receiving hospital, how long was it before the required specialist or definitive treatment began?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
ImmediatelyFewer than 5Suppressed
Within 30 minutesFewer than 5Suppressed
31–60 minutes00.0%
1–2 hours00.0%
2–4 hoursFewer than 5Suppressed
4–8 hours00.0%
8–12 hours00.0%
12–24 hours00.0%
More than 24 hours00.0%
The required treatment was not provided00.0%
Not applicableFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

30. OUTCOME — What was the immediate outcome?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
The patient was treated successfully and dischargedFewer than 5Suppressed
The patient was admitted and recoveredFewer than 5Suppressed
The patient improved but required continuing treatment00.0%
The patient was left with short-term complications00.0%
The patient was left with long-term complicationsFewer than 5Suppressed
The patient’s condition became worseFewer than 5Suppressed
The patient died00.0%
The outcome is not yet known00.0%
Prefer not to sayFewer than 5Suppressed

31. Were there delays at any stage that you believe affected the patient’s outcome?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Yes—definitelyFewer than 5Suppressed
Yes—possiblyFewer than 5Suppressed
NoFewer than 5Suppressed
Unsure00.0%

32. Did a health professional indicate that a delay may have affected the outcome or treatment options?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
YesFewer than 5Suppressed
NoFewer than 5Suppressed
The issue was discussed but no conclusion was given00.0%
No explanation was provided00.0%
UnsureFewer than 5Suppressed
Prefer not to say00.0%

33. What continuing effects or complications occurred?

Answered: 5 — more than one answer could be selected

AnswerResponsesPercentage
No continuing effects00.0%
Reduced heart function or continuing cardiac problemsFewer than 5Suppressed
Weakness, paralysis or mobility problems00.0%
Speech, memory or cognitive problems00.0%
Breathing difficulties00.0%
Ongoing painFewer than 5Suppressed
Need for additional surgery or medical treatment5100.0%
Need for rehabilitationFewer than 5Suppressed
Need for personal or family care00.0%
Mental health effectsFewer than 5Suppressed
Loss of employment or ability to workFewer than 5Suppressed
Financial hardshipFewer than 5Suppressed
The patient died00.0%
Another effect00.0%
Unsure00.0%
Prefer not to say00.0%

34. How much does the event continue to affect the patient or family?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
1—No continuing effectFewer than 5Suppressed
2—Minor effectFewer than 5Suppressed
3—Moderate effectFewer than 5Suppressed
4—Major effectFewer than 5Suppressed
5—Severe or permanent effect00.0%
Prefer not to say00.0%

35. FAILURE POINT — Where did the most significant delay or failure occur?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Recognising the seriousness of the conditionFewer than 5Suppressed
Obtaining telephone or emergency assistance00.0%
Waiting for an ambulance00.0%
Travel to the first treatment point00.0%
Ambulance handover at the hospital00.0%
Waiting for initial hospital assessmentFewer than 5Suppressed
Waiting for diagnostic tests or results00.0%
Required treatment was unavailable locallyFewer than 5Suppressed
Waiting for a specialist00.0%
Waiting for a hospital bedFewer than 5Suppressed
Waiting for a transfer decision00.0%
Waiting for transfer transport00.0%
Travel to the receiving hospital00.0%
Waiting for treatment at the receiving hospital00.0%
Discharge or follow-up care00.0%
There was no significant delay or failure00.0%
Unsure00.0%

36. How well were the patient and family kept informed?

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
1—Not informedFewer than 5Suppressed
2—Poorly informed00.0%
3—Adequately informedFewer than 5Suppressed
4—Well informedFewer than 5Suppressed
5—Very well informed00.0%
Not applicable00.0%

40. I understand that my anonymous response may be combined with other responses and used in public reports, policy discussions or submissions.

Answered: 5

AnswerResponsesPercentage
Yes5100.0%
No00.0%